Understanding the Descriptivist Theory of Names: A Comprehensive Guide

Dive into the intriguing world of the Descriptivist Theory of Names. Explore its core elements, variants, and the challenges it faces. Understand its modern interpretations and relevance today.

When it comes to the philosophy of language, few theories have been as intriguing and controversial as the Descriptivist Theory of Names. This theory, deeply rooted in the works of philosophers like Frege and Russell, has been the subject of extensive debate and reinterpretation. In this article, we aim to provide a coherent and comprehensive understanding of this compelling theory.


The Core Elements of Descriptivism

At its most basic, Descriptivism posits that names have meaning because they are associated with a set of descriptions or attributes. For instance, the name “Socrates” might be associated with descriptions like “the philosopher who drank hemlock” or “the teacher of Plato.”


The Role of Definite Descriptions

One of the key components of Descriptivism is the use of definite descriptions. These are phrases that are used to uniquely identify an object or individual. Russell was particularly keen on this aspect, using definite descriptions to explain how names get their meaning.


Variants of Descriptivism

  1. Cluster Descriptivism

    • This is a version of Descriptivism where multiple descriptions contribute to the meaning of a name. It’s a flexible model that allows for a range of descriptions to be associated with a single name.
  2. Meaning vs. Reference-Fixing

    • Some philosophers argue that while names may have a set of descriptions that give them meaning, these descriptions are not what fix the reference of the name. This distinction is crucial for understanding the limitations and strengths of Descriptivism.

Challenges to Descriptivism

  1. Kripke’s Criticisms

    • Saul Kripke, a prominent philosopher, has presented several arguments against Descriptivism. His criticisms focus on issues like the modal argument, the semantic argument, and the epistemic argument. Kripke’s work has led many to reconsider the validity of Descriptivism.
  2. The Issue of Non-Unique Descriptions

    • One of the major challenges for Descriptivism is that speakers often associate incorrect or non-unique descriptions with names. This has led many to question whether Descriptivism can truly serve as a universal theory of names.

Revival and Modern Interpretations

Despite criticisms, Descriptivism has seen a revival in recent years, especially with the advent of two-dimensionalism, which offers a more nuanced approach to the theory.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What is Russell’s Descriptivist theory?

    • Russell’s Descriptivist theory posits that names gain their meaning through associated definite descriptions, which serve to uniquely identify the referent.
  2. What is the causal theory of names?

    • The causal theory of names suggests that names have a direct link to their referents, bypassing the need for descriptive associations.
  3. What is the Millian theory of names?

    • The Millian theory argues that names are simply tags attached to objects or individuals, devoid of any descriptive meaning.

Key Takeaways

The Descriptivist Theory of Names remains a central topic in the philosophy of language. While it has its critics, it also has merits that make it a compelling area of study. For those interested in delving deeper, we recommend the works of Bertrand Russell and Saul Kripke.


Topic Keywords: Descriptivist Theory of Names, Russell, Kripke, philosophy of language, definite descriptions, cluster descriptivism, meaning, reference-fixing, criticisms, revival, two-dimensionalism


Descriptivist Theory of Names

Follow Me
Latest posts by Johnny Holiday (see all)